Info & Quotes: People Supporting the Astoria Vacancy Tax: These are the “Neighbors” We’re Supposed to Help!

ANDY KIPP AND THE ASTORIA HOUSING ALLIANCE (Candidate for City Council)

Andy Kipp is president of the Astoria Housing Alliance (AHA), chief petitioner for the Vacancy Tax and the central financial supporter of Astoria Housing for All. AHA describes itself as an Oregon nonprofit operating under Section 501(c)(4)—a form of organization permitted to engage substantially in lobbying and political advocacy.

Newly obtained records from the Oregon Elections System for Tracking and Reporting (ORESTAR) show that Kipp personally supplied at least $4,441 in cash contributions;  $397.07 in reported in-kind support. Andy Kipp personally supplied the money used to pay the campaign’s $3,431 ballot-title legal bill.

THE 180-DAY STATEMENT

On June 3, 2025, Kipp submitted legislative testimony on behalf of the Astoria Housing Alliance concerning SB 1095—a proposed Oregon law that would have authorized cities and counties to impose vacancy fees, potentially secured by liens against the affected homes.

The letter asserted that “many of the vacant properties in Astoria are only occupied for a weekend or two per year” and called an amendment classifying those properties as not vacant “surprising.”

AHA then urged lawmakers to return to a 180-day occupancy threshold, claiming that was: “more consistent with our on-the-ground experience regarding the empty homes that proliferate our neighborhoods.”The letter provided no physical property count, no address-level inventory, no survey methodology and no documentation establishing how many Astoria homes were actually occupied for only “a weekend or two per year.”

But it did reveal the policy position clearly: lawful personal use of a privately owned home for fewer than roughly six months per year should expose that property to government punishment.

The June 3, 2025 AHA letterhead identified:

•    Andy Kipp — President AHA, Running for District 1 Astoria City Council

•    Vance Lump — Treasurer

At that time, Lump and Mazzarella were also sitting members of the Astoria City Council.

That does not prove either personally wrote or approved every sentence in Kipp’s letter. It does establish that two sitting councilors were publicly identified in leadership positions with the organization advocating the 180-day policy.

Astorians are entitled to know when an advocacy organization advancing a major tax proposal includes sitting city officials among its leadership.

Andrea Mazzarella, Astoria City Council Member, Ward 2, Facebook September 4, 2026

Blue Scorcher Bakery

The Membership of the Blue Scorcher Bakery endorses the Housing Initiative. As a co-op, Strong Community is one of our core business values. Our full-time residents see us through the quiet season and the relationships we build makes this work worth doing.

Joyful Work is another of our core business values. Work cannot be joyful if workers aren’t able to secure their basic needs, including adequate housing. The person making your latte shouldn’t have to commute half an hour into town from a moldy apartment that they can’t afford to complain about. Bakers shouldn’t have to drive in on 202 at 3 AM while homes within walking distance are empty.

Every year we lose workers and friends because they can’t see a future for themselves in Astoria. The housing problem is a huge part of that calculus. Astoria is at a critical point and we have to decide—do we want to be a community or a theme park?

Lily Grace, Facebook August 27, 2026

Serene Jaguar7950, Facebook August 29 2026

Lauern Maylon, Nextdoor September 2, 2026

Zoe Higginbottom, Nextdoor September 2, 2026

There’s a difference between housing being available and housing being available at a price the local economy will accommodate. The second home market is part of the problem precisely because it decouples property values from local income levels. Your example actually shows that discouraging second home ownership *will* improve housing availability for people who live and work here full time.

DAN HUBNER

Astoria Housing for All identifies Dan Hubner as an organizer and treasurer of the Vacancy Tax campaign.

Hubner has publicly presented and defended the proposal, including declaring:

“Vacant homes are not neutral in our community.”

His role is also confirmed by the campaign-finance records. Every one of the 70 transactions in the current ORESTAR export identifies Daniel Hubner as the person who both filed and attested to the report.

That makes Hubner more than a vocal supporter of the measure. He is a formally identified campaign organizer and the treasurer responsible for reporting the political committee’s finances.

Lauren Maylon Nextdoor September 2026

I’m still for it in the long term past the lawsuites [sic], helps either fund programs or pushes non residents to let locals have the limited housing. People who live here imho come first.

Elliot Holm Long Beach WA Nextdoor September 2026

Misc Nextdoor comment: “Thank you Paula for saying this. We own two homes and we are definitely not rich”.

Elliot Holm: “Sell one then.”

Jacqueline Hansen, Facebook September 2026

The average social security benefit is $2k a month. I would love for these multi home owners to live on this only and try to live on just that and buy a house with it. Or even better, try to pay all their basic bills with it. Then maybe they will understand the reality the rest of us live in. So cry us a fucking River with your bs! Most working class in Astoria make $32-$50k a year. That’s barely a livable wage for a single person!!! And not even close enough to save for a one house never mind two. It’s barely enough for rent! So who the F is out of touch again?

Thomas Jenkins August 23, 2026, addressing the Astoria City Council

At the August 3 Astoria City Council meeting, Thomas “Tom” Jenkins appeared to speak in favor of the Vacancy Tax. He provided his address and openly acknowledged:

“Postally, I’m in Astoria. Geographically, I am outside of the city limits.” Jenkins addressing the Astoria City Council August 3, 2026. Jenkins cannot vote in Astoria elections.

He then announced:

“I address the City Council and the residents in the room tonight as a member of the Oregon Working Families Party here in Clatsop County.” Jenkins confirmed publicly and on the record:

“We have endorsed this petition…” He also promised: educate voters…”

“Should it go to the ballot this fall, the Working Families Party stands in support and will be out there to show support. 

Near the end of the article, 1000 Friends of Oregon states:

“If Astoria’s initiative passes, it may set a precedent for other cities in Oregon whose housing markets are heavily impacted by tourism and second home ownership.”

The article continues by saying that many cities are looking for creative ways to fund housing and infrastructure and that the Astoria measure “could be a promising tool in cities’ toolkits.”

That is a member of the Oregon Working Families Party speaking directly to the Astoria City Council aboutthe party’s involvement.

Jenkins has also been one of the tax’s most persistent advocates online.

His position toward owners who may be unable to absorb another $3,000 or $6,000 annual tax is blunt. 

“If you can’t afford taxes on your vacation home or your investment property, you can’t afford to have a 2nd home. The community cannot afford it, either.”

Jenkins does not live within Astoria city limits. He cannot vote on this tax.He will not be deciding whether Astoria property owners must file annual declarations with the City. Yet he and the Working Families Party intend to persuade Astoria voters that owners should rent their homes, sell them, restructure their lives—or pay thousands of dollars every year.

…And More Tom Jenkins, NOT An Astoria Resident. September 7, 2025.

“Floyd E. Holcom no one wants your housing because you are such an atrocious person and careless landlord. I can’t find anyone who recommends renting from you”.

Asa Clibourne, Facebook September 2026

“No sympathy for you. Just pay the damn 6k or sell your house. Astoria needs housing more than it needs you.”

A NEW ENTRY FROM IDA LOVOID! September 2026


This website is beyond tacky. It’s full of character assassinations, misinformation and rage bait. I’m so sorry people with ten vacant homes feel the need to challenge someone who believes we should all have the opportunity to live where we work. Further, if you have this much time to make a website this polished and profess to not be able to afford a $3k a year tax on your EMPTY property while our workers and teachers struggle every day for stable housing it is very telling. 99% of voters have nothing to do with this vacant home tax and you are presenting it as something that will affect every home owner which it most definitely will not. The bill is very clear about exemptions for pretty much everything human and there’s nothing scary about having a town that takes care of its workers. You are spreading lies about someone who has done nothing but notice a need for reform and work for it. You do not know him. Our downtown buildings were in dire need of attention ten years ago and incentivizing the owners to share has resulted in a boom for the economy, so many amazing shops and restaurants. People wanting to visit, people able to live and where were you then? You were still living in California? Facts are facts and doxxing people is against the law. I know that when we attack others it is usually a projection of our own insecurities—this is quoted from the website you are encouraging people to go to for “facts”. What is your “weird agenda?” Why are you afraid of people having “empathy?” This website is more expensive than the tax. Why are you trying to convince regular people with one home to vote against a livable community? In the last ten years the average home price in Astoria has sometimes more than doubled because people wanted to retire here from somewhere else at 50. They could afford it thanks to social incentives that don’t exist anymore, now our kids can’t. Now the average home price is in Oregon is 500k and good paying union jobs are being replaced with AI and the people who use it. Why would someone with over a million in equity be fighting a 3k tax so hard as to use AI to make a slick website with a bunch of emotionally charged fear mongering quotes and images. Did you hire a local website developer? I would way rather have a teacher as a neighbor than an AI generated one with a ring cam from California.

Jaime B; Nextdoor October 2026

Homeowners, especially those who own vacant houses, are the minority in this community, but they have most of the money. The democratic process is “one person, one vote” though – having more money doesn’t guarantee you a bigger impact. So, opponents of the bill have found that their only recourse is to try to use their money to create the illusion of popular support through endless yard signs on the properties they own and now AI-generated representations of human support that doesn’t exist. Fascinating stuff. Supported by: Stephen Carlson ( Knappa Dock Rd), Amber Cowan (Warrenton!), Ida Iovoid (South Slope), Jennifer Vanni (Upper Astoria).